So says Dr Mercola in his discussion with Dr Judy Mikovits; she’s a molecular biologist.
These are the key takeaways:
- By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as “vaccines” rather than gene therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41, which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims
- The mRNA injections are gene therapies that do not fulfill a single criteria or definition of a vaccine
- COVID-19 “vaccines” do not impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease. They only are designed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you get infected. As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine
- Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they’ve not even been able to establish a causal link between the virus and the clinical disease
- By calling this experimental gene therapy technology a “vaccine,” they are circumventing liability for damages that would otherwise apply
Apparently, the Pfizer and Moderna shots are really “chemotherapy gene therapy technology.”
The whole article, which makes for a very interesting read, can be found here:
I’ve been discussing the shots with colleagues and one mentioned that Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine uses traditional technology and is a true vaccine. The same goes for Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine.
Information on both can be found here: